Identity and Consumer Culture

Identity and Consumer CultureIn the post-modern connection, function became a genuinely notion in volumes day-to-day life, waster refining occupies the important position oer the historical bear upon of later modernness in the west, no field we atomic number 18 black or white, fat or slim, male or female, doctor or housewife, European or Australian, large number with a extensive regulate of identities act as submitrs in routine lives be obviously. The master(prenominal) task of this essay is to discuss the relationship between consumer neighborlyization and individuals individuality, whether the coetaneous thoughts of indistinguishability element go over with the qualities of a consumer kitchen-gardening, whether the qualities of consumer glossiness pose particular challengers for individuals to flex their identities. This essay was divided into twain primary(prenominal) parts in the startle part, polar theoretical perspectives both on identity oper ator and consumer civilisation allow be discussed in the second central part, the essay will conk out and demonstrate how these two themes interrelated with each other(a).Over the centuries, there were a series of approaches on the subject about identity and self-identity from antithetical aspects psychology, well-disposed psychology, anthropology, sociology and philosophy, this essay will talk about identity from sociology and psychology perspectives. As Mach (2007) argues that identity is a symbolic rebuildion, it is an image of ourselves, which we build in a routine of communication with others. Therefore, it is dynamic and contextual, improving via dialogue and by the distinguishable ways in which people exchange the meaning of the diversity of symbols that list their ethnic atmosphere and their tender relations. Such as material culture, literature, rite and myth, they are all the cultural heritage of people involved in the inter reach, many other symbolic bri ng into beingions (including these) plays a part in the butt of construction of images, acting as the material out of which all these images as well as borders between groups are constructed. The construction of the identity of atomic number 53s self and of others involves not only building symbolic images but besides spot relations, (March, 2007, p.54-55) which we must channelize into consideration. Between sociable groups there is an unequal sense of equilibrium of office staff, the wreak of communal symbolic identification take up the portion of sustaining and legitimising the existing state of affairs through creating and re-creating the identity of all the members in that complaisant context. Changes of symbolic identification and fonts of identity result from changes in the balance of power. Ardener claims that the construction of image of others and their model of identity is a performance of delusion (Andener, 1989 in Mach, 2007). The acceptance of this imposed identification whitethorn result from it. A person of a group may usually accept their identity as it has been dod by their partners in the structure of society, in particular, if these partners conquer a stronger position in the structure of society. (Mach, 2007)Mach continues argues that there are two factors hit identity one is the neighborly relations of power and other one is the symbolic image of the ser ungodlinessman. The former contains not only the inner power structure within the group but also the relations with other groups. For example, if the power structure is a particular social group is disenable or oppressed, wherefore its possibility to develop activities in which its identity influence and transformed scum bag be impaired. The latter factor is the conceptual ass of these activities. (Mach, 2007)From a psychological perspective, Erik (1968) claims that identity formation makes use of a process of concurrent reflection and observation, a process happen s on all levels of psychological functioning, by which the individual opines him/herself on the basis of what he/she perceives to be the way in which other people judge him/her in coincidence to themselves, while he/she judges their way of judging him/her in unison with how he /she perceives him/herself in comparison to them and to models that spend a penny become pertinent to him/her. This process is more(prenominal) often than not unconscious except where internal conditions and outside(a) circumstances combine to aggravate an elated, or painful, identity-consciousness. (Erik, 1968, p.23) Furthermore, the process is always development and changing, increasing incompatibleiation and it becomes more comprehensive as the individual produces sensitive of a broadening circle of others significant to him/her. Finally, discussing with identity, we can not develop mutual change and personal growth, nor can we detach the identity crisis in persons life and introduce crisis in historical development, because these two combine to intend each other and are congener to each other. (Erik, 1968) Those are two theoretical perspectives on identity, next, let us move on to quality at the concept of consumer culture.Everyday when we wake up we began to consume, using toothpaste and facial cleanser to wash, having well-nigh bread and a bottle of milk for breakfast, then we go to work produce goods, operate or experiences for others to consume. Then we fetching a break from work only to consume a exquisite sandwich in the restaurant, after work we go to some clubs or pubs, if we still have some energy, go shopping or enjoying an infrequent concert, or even bought a CD and listening through computer. Therefore, our daily life is typically nonionised as alternating between generation/space of work and times/spaces of consumption.(Sassatelli, R, 2007, p.3) So consumption has played a pivotal role in our daily life. In the modern world, central social practic e and cultural determine, identities, aspirations and ideas are defined and manoeuvered relative to consumption rather than other social aspects, much(prenominal) as spectral cosmology or military role. (Slater, 1997)As for Slater (1997), consumer culture is the main mode of cultural production developed over the course of modernity in the west. It stands for a social arrangement in which the relation between social resources and lived culture, between meaningful ways of life and the material and symbolic resources on which they rely, is arbitrated through markets. Consumer culture establish a system in which consumption is controlled by the consumption of commodities, and in which cultural reproduction is generally understood to be performed through the practice of liberated personal election in the private sphere of everyday life.Slater (1997) outlined some main features and characters in consumer culture first, consumer culture is a culture of consumption. When considering this involve to regard the main set of a society to be organized through consumption practice as well as in some sense to derive from them. Therefore, we skill describe contemporary society as a pecuniary culture based on money, as materialistic, as commodified or as a society of alternative and consumer sovereignty. Moreover, values from the sphere of consumption spill over into other areas of social action, such that modern society is totally a consumer culture, and not just in its specially consuming activities. Second, consumer culture is the culture of market society. We usually consume goods, services and experiences which have been produced exclusively with the purpose of being sold on the market to consumers. To a certain extent, essential to our consumption is the action of choosing among a series of alternative commodities produced by organizations and institutions which are not interested in cultural values and need but in economic values and profit. The consumers acc ess to consumption is organized by the distribution of material and cultural sources-money and taste- which itself is determined by market relations wage relation and social folk. Third, in principle, consumer culture is universal and impersonal. Although we know that access to commodities is limited by access to money, goodness consumption is treated in principle as the activity of whole population. The idea of selling products is not designed to the call for of a unique and known person or community, however, which might be sold to anyone anywhere, presumes generalizable and impersonal relations of exchange as the foundation for mediating consumption. Fourth, consumer culture identifies freedom with private choice and life. Consumer choice is a private action, it is still the ordinary version of the broader notion of private, individual freedom. However, the individual privacy choice seems to contradict social order, authority and solidarity. In many aspects, this is the mai n critics in consumer culture. Fifth, in principle, consumer needs are insatiable and unlimited. In consumer culture, the continuous believe for more and the continuous production of more likings is taken to be blueprint for its citizens as well as crucial for socio-economic progress and order. The increased is astray understood as both a spur and a result to individuals desires to become increasingly imaginative, sophisticated and personal, as well as individuals desire to advance themselves economically and socially. Sixth, within a post-traditional society, consumer culture is privileged fair for negotiating identity and spot- the communication and practice of social position-under these conditions, tradition regulation is replaced by construction and negotiation, and consumer goods are important to the way in which we construct our social appearance, networks and our structures of our social value. However, Consumer culture is a contradiction in terms of culture because i t characterizes the destruction of a stable traditional social order by capitalist and industrial relations that degrade real culture, challenge the social values that are essential for social solidarity and render peoples social identities liquified and unstable.Through consumer culture, through the use of goods, services and experiences that we formulate ourselves as social identities and present these identities. Goods can indicate social identity, but in the post-traditional society, comparing to others identity seems to be more a function of consumption. The images we constructed on the external of our bodies, our living location -appearance- become a central way of taste and identifying ourselves and each other. (Slater, 1997) In terms of appearance, Giddens argues that bodily appearance and demeanour become especially important with the advent of modernity and modes of facial adornment or browse to some horizontal surfaces mean individualization. (Giddens, A, 1991)On the one hand, our personal impression testify our identity, so we consume certain goods to make ourselves look better and happen better which could be considered as a sign we construct our self-identity. For example, women consume cosmetics and beautiful dress to make them look good some people use weight loss products to make them look slim others may go to health clubs to built muscles or practice yoga to make them healthy. We pick out these goods over others precisely because they are not neutral, because they are culturally conflicting and even in opposition to those perspectives on the organization of society and identity which we urgency to refute. In this sense consumption is the very arena in which culture is fought over and licked into shape. (Sassatelli, 2007, p.98) This means that consumption reflects fundamental choices of which type of society we want to live in and which type of person we wish well to be, and what we do not agree to take and what we do not want to b e. (Sassatelli, 2007) It is a process of internal self-examination and self-communication. In this process, people judge themselves, sectionalizationify themselves and make themselves to favour, because consumers have sovereignty over their own needs, desires, wants, identities. (Slater, 1997, p.34)On the other, goods are good to think they can be treated as symbolic means of classifying the world, as the tools of a particular form of non-verbal communication. (Douglas, M, 1996) Our world and society are classifies by goods into different class, lower class, middle class and upper class, people within different class have different social identity, correspond to Slater (1997), in principle consumers needs are insatiable and unlimited and whose desires grow much faster than their fortunes, (Ewen, 1999) So people in different class with different social identity and status want to rank among a advanced class to pursue higher(prenominal) identity in the manner of high value consumpt ion. For instance, some may choose to go further for education and get masters degree or doctors degree or others may choose to consume a famous brand to flatter their self-esteem, such as Chanel, Gucci, Christian Dior, Swarovski, Lancme and so forth, therefore, some factories may copy those fashionable and popular luxuries from upper class to fulfill those individuals desire and satisfaction on proving their social identities and status. A ontogenesis market in cheap luxury items allowed others to purchase the symbolic accoutrements of status. (Ewen, 1999, p. 59)We could negotiate, define, remedy or observe our identities through goods, through consumption, through consumer culture we also could be defined, guided and identified by those goods, institutions or communities vice versa, they are important in our daily life for constructing, reconstructing and keep an eye oning our identity. Consumer culture offers wide range of guidance on the relation between the expanding sphere of meaningful consumer goods, experiences and services and the scheme of maintaining a self. This comes in the form of consumer magazines and the consumerist chromatography column columns in more general magazines as well as in the form of advertising. (Slater, 1997) For example, a teen magazine named sugar considered as style bible for the teenage girl readers, because it provides a wide range of guides and instructions in the trading operations of femininity. To some degree, the developments in the teenage magazine industry during the 1990s can be seen as an intensification of the process of logic of consumption. Increasingly promotional and editorial features have tied the making of adolescent feminine selves to the deployment and acquisition of enamor goods and products and celebrated shopping and consumption as specifically feminine pleasures. trade publishers and directors were particularly active in constructing the figure of different consumers identity to march the l ogic of consumer capitalism, and creating a natural fit between the demands and desires of those consumers with the solutions provided by the magazine product. Magazines are presented as dominant to the masteryful management of their readers who will have developed a strong sense of their own identity. (Bell Hollows, 2005, p. 173-177) Also, advertisement is another guidance guide us orientate ourselves for constructing self-identity. Slater (1997, p.86) claimed that in a commercial world, advertising provides maps of modernity, authoritative, discourses through and about objects which allow us to orient ourselves to the social meanings of things. For example, appealing to insecurities and dissatisfaction around the job, certain advertisements not only offered their goods as a sort of job insurance, but also suggested that through the utilisation of their products one might become a business success-the capitalist concept of individual self- fulfillment. (Ewen, 1976, p. 46-47) How ever, under some circumstances, some advertisement or promotional images may not genuine or if the individual read them amiss, they may be lead very wide astray, because a promotional subject matter is a complex of significations which at once represents, advocates, and anticipates the circulating entity or entities to which it refers. (Wernick,1991) muckle with different identities or people want to prove their distinct identities play on choosing, we have no choice but to choose (Giddens, A, 1991, p.81), choosing according to ones taste is a issue of identifying goods that are objectively adjust to ones position. (Bourdieu, P, 1984) However, consumer culture increases the individuals experiences of anxiety and risk by offering more choice images and choices of different identities and by raising the sense of social risk let in for making the wrong choice, This kind of risk may cause identity crisis to some extent with the process of modernity. The description of modernity as ga ge identity crisis link up with consumer culture in several ways first, the symbol of individual choice controls our sense of the social. Social structure and action are progressively understood in terms of individual choices take on in relation to the needs of/for self. Through the image of consumption modern identity is best understood. In the pluralized social world we choose a self-identity from the shop-window objects, experiences and actions are all reflexively confronted as part of the need to maintain and construct self-identity. Second, identity itself can be seen as a commodity which can be sale. Self is not an internal sense of genuineness but rather a predictable condition of social success and survival. We have to create and sell an identity to a variety of social markets with the purpose of having intimate relationships, jobs and social standing. Third, both material and symbolic resources through which we create and maintain identities increasingly take the form of c onsumer goods and actions through which we create appearance and arrange social encounters and leisure time. Conversely, in post-traditional anomie, the quest for identity is debatably the greatest market of all, or the motivation underlies all markets, at least, selling take for granted that we want goods primarily for the desirable and meaningful identities with which they might endow us. At the same time consumerism exploits mass identity crisis by offering its goods as solutions to the problems of identity, and in the procedure strengthens it by proffering ever more plural values and methods of being. Consumer culture breeds and lives in the cultural deficits of modernity. (Slater, D, 1997)As a conclusion, this essay goes overview the Mach and Eriks perspective on identity and Slaters concept about consumer culture and analyzes the relationship between those two themes through consumer culture individuals could construct self-identity and present these identities when consuming , because goods can indicate social identity, in another word, people could construct identity in the back ground of consumer culture, this is a process we enumerate on our self and active. Also, we were received and guided through media consumption vice versa, this point was demonstrated by magazines and advertisement in consumer culture, and within this process compared to the previous one individuals are not so active to construct identity to some extent, they were guided by media information. Last, people making choice when consuming, when we make the wrong choice will lead to identity crisis, consumer culture increases the individuals experiences of anxiety and risk by offering more choice images and choices of different identities and by raising the sense of social risk let in for making the wrong choice, This kind of risk may cause identity crisis to some extent with the process of modernity. Therefore, for the previous two points identity is fit with the contemporary notion s of consumer culture, and for the last one, consumer culture poses the challenge for constructing an identity.